Objective measurement of refractive errors: Comparison of plusoptix s08 with a standard autorefractometer
Soner Demirel 1 * , Semsettin Bilak, Isa Yuvacı, Tongabay Cumurcu, Cemil Colak
More Detail
1 İnönü University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Malatya, Turkey* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of Plusoptix S08 with a standart autorefractometer (Topcon RM 8000B) in children and adults.
Methods: 220 eyes of 110 children, with a mean age of 8.06 ± 2.89 years old were examined to compare non-cycloplegic measurements provided by Plusoptix S08 and cycloplegic measurements provided by Topcon RM- 8000B autorefractometer. In addition, 254 eyes of 127 adults, with a mean age of 33.3 ± 13.36 years old were examined to compare non-cycloplegic refractive mea­surements provided by Plusoptix S08 and Topcon RM 8000B autorefractometer. All measurements were repeat­ed three times. Median sphere, cylinder, spherical equiva­lent and cylindrical axes as Jackson cross cylinder power measurements (J0 and J45) were compared statistically.
Results: The median differences in spheres, cylinders, spherical equivalents, J0 and J45 powers were –0.25 D (P< 0.001), –0.25 D (P< 0.001), –0.25 D (P< 0.001), –0.02 (P= 0.038), 0.00 (P= 0.395), in children, respec­tively. These values were 0.50 (P<0.001), 0.00 (P<0.001), 0.375 (P<0.001), 0.03 (P= 0.053), 0.79 (P= 0.081), in adults, respectively.
Conclusion: Plusoptix S08 has a myopic misspelled ac­cording to Topcon-RM8000B autorefractometer in chil­dren. However, measurements provided with Plusoptix S08 were more hyperopic than those with Topcon RM- 8000B autorefractometer in adults.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

J Clin Exp Invest, 2013, Volume 4, Issue 1, 40-46

https://doi.org/10.5799/ahinjs.01.2013.01.0231

Publication date: 14 Mar 2013

Article Views: 2548

Article Downloads: 1333

Open Access References How to cite this article