Comparison of the efficacy of esmolol and lidocaine in the control of hemodynamic response associated with intubation: A randomized controlled trial
Tolga Ergönenç 1 * , Jalan Şerbetçigil, Uğur Uzun, Ali Dirik, Gülşen Bican
More Detail
1 Education and Research Hospital, Dept. Anesthesiology&Reanimation, Sakarya, Turkey
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this randomized study is to compare the effects of esmolol and lidocaine in the con­trol of hemodynamic response caused by endotracheal intubation.
Methods: In this study, 40 patients with ASA I-II physical status and between the ages of 19 and 76 were included and randomly divided into two groups. In the Group E (n = 20), iv bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg esmolol, in the Group L (n = 20), iv bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg 2% lidocaine were given with iv bolus injection in 30 seconds. All pa­tients received the same anesthetic technique. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate measure­ments were done at specified times and recorded. Re­cords were assessed by an anesthesiologist blinded to which drug is applied.
Results: There was no difference between the groups in demographic data (p>0.05). In both groups, with the implementation of the study drug, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure decreased compared to controls, this reduction was lower in Group E than Group L. In Group L, SBP values of 1.5 and 7 minutes were higher than Group E (p <0.05). In Group L, DBP and MBP values of 1.5 and 3.5 minutes were higher than Group E (p <0.05).
Conclusion: In conclusion, 1.5 mg/kg esmolol or 1.5 mg/ kg lidocaine administered prior to induction were not su­perior to each other regarding suppression of hemody­namic responses to intubation.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.5799/ahinjs.01.2013.01.0228

J Clin Exp Invest, 2013 - Volume 4 Issue 1, pp. 20-27

Publication date: 14 Mar 2013

Article Views: 1554

Article Downloads: 387

Open Access References How to cite this article