Minimally painful retrieval of ureteral stents using by ureterescope
Haluk Söylemez 1 * , Bülent Altunoluk, Kadir Önem, Fatih Oğuz
More Detail
1 Özel Müjde Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği, Malatya - Turkey
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Aim: The standard method for retrieving the ureteral stents is the cystoscopic technique.  We describe a minimally painful method for retrieving ureteral stents by using an ureteroscope.
Methods: A total of 60 patients with ureteral stents were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized into a cystoscopic (30 cases) and an ureteroscopic (30 cases) group. All stents were retrieved by a cystoscope in the first group and by an ureteroscope in the second group, under topical anesthesia. Patients in each group were assessed for stented time, stent side and reason of stent placement, operative time, peroperative pain, postoperative pain, irritative voiding symptoms and hematuria.
Results: Stents were successfully retrieved in 60 patients. There were no statistical differences in the two groups regarding patient’s gender and age or stent side, operative time and stented time (p>0.05). Mean operative pain score was significantly higher in the cystoscopic group than in the ureteroscopic group (p<0.01). The irritative voiding symptom scores and hematuria were more prevalent in the first group than the second (p< 0.05).
Conclusion: In present study ureteroscopic stent retrieval was found to be minimally a painful, safe and reliable method. The ureteroscopic retrieval procedure is highly tolerable by patients than the cystoscopic retrieval. We suggest that it may be the standard technique for stent retrieval.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.5799/ahinjs.01.2010.01.0002

J Clin Exp Invest, 2010 - Volume 1 Issue 1, pp. 7-11

Publication date: 14 Apr 2010

Article Views: 1598

Article Downloads: 435

Open Access References How to cite this article