Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate whether more than one observer or fractional flow reserve has the same results in assessing coronary lesion severity in intermediate lesions.
Methods: Our hospital’s database was searched for fractional flow reserve procedures and then these patient’s lesions were assessed visually by three experienced interventional cardiologist.
Results: 8 of 46 patients were (17.4%) female and 38 of 46 were (82,6%) male. Average age was 61±11 years (Male: 60±11 / Female: 70±7 years). One observer could only detect 66.7% of severe lesions and 76.2% of non-severe lesions. When two observers agreed about lesion severity, true detection of severe lesions was (max) 76.7%, and true detection of non-severe lesions was (max) 66.7%, so a decrease in true detection of non-severe lesions was observed. When one of the observers called a lesion “severe” and the lesion was assumed as “severe”, detection of a severe lesion was 83.3% (p=0.017); if all of the observers agreed that the lesion was “non-severe” then true detection of a non-severe lesion was 90.5% (p<0.05).
Conclusion: One observer can’t detect a lesion severity sufficiently, but when three observers’ information was evaluated, there was nearly 90% concordance with fractional flow reserve results.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.